Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
updated 2008-05-09
 Compiled by David Chalmers (Editor) & David Bourget (Assistant Editor), Australian National University. Submit an entry.
 
click here for help on how to search

Philosophy of Consciousness :: Specific Views on Consciousness :: Neutral Monism

See also:
Banks, E. C. (2004). The philosophical roots of Ernst Mach's economy of thought. Synthese 139 (1):23-53. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links)
Bhattacharya, Manjulekha (1972). Ernst Mach: Neutral monism. Studi Internazionali Di Filosofia 4:145-182. (Cited by 1 | Google)
Bode, Boyd H. (1905). 'Pure experience' and the external world. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (5):128-133. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links)
Bode, Boyd H. (1905). The concept of pure experience. Philosophical Review 14 (6):684-695. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links)
Bradley McGilvary, Evander (1911). Experience as pure and consciousness as meaning. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8 (19):511-525. (Google)
Bradley McGilvary, Evander (1907). Pure experience and reality: A reassertion. Philosophical Review 16 (4):422-424. (Google)
Cooper, W. E. (1990). William James's theory of mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy (October) 571 (October):571-593. (Google)
Drabinski, John E. (1993). Radical empiricism and phenomenology: Philosophy and the pure stuff of experience. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (3):226-242. (Google)
Hamilton, Andy (1990). Ernst Mach and the elimination of subjectivity. Ratio 3 (2):117-135. (Cited by 5 | Google)
James, William (1904). A world of pure experience. Journal of Philosophy Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (21):533-543. (Cited by 36 | Google | More links)
James, William (1904). A world of pure experience. II. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (21):561-570. (Google | More links)
James, William & Perry, Ralph Barton (eds.) (1996). Essays in Radical Empiricism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Cited by 158 | Google | More links)
James, William (1905). How two minds can know one thing. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (7):176-181. (Cited by 5 | Google | More links)
Lockwood, Michael (1981). What was Russell's neutral monism? Midwest Studes in Philosophy 6:143-58. (Cited by 5 | Google)
Lowe, Victor (1942). William James' Pluralistic Metaphysics of Experience. In Victor Lowe (ed.), In Commemoration Of William James: 1842-1942. Columbia University Press. (Google)
Moller, Mark S. (2001). James, perception and the Miller-Bode objections. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (4):609-626. (Google)
Seigfried, Charlene H. (1992). William James's concrete analysis of experience. The Monist 75 (4):538-550. (Google)
Sellars, Roy Wood (1907). The nature of experience. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (1):14-18. (Google | More links)
Stubenberg, Leopold (online). Neutral monism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Cited by 4 | Google)
Taylor, Eugene & Wozniak, Robert H. (1996). Pure experience: The response to William James. In E.I. Taylor & R.H. Wozniak (eds.), Pure Experience: The Response to William James. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. (Cited by 11 | Google)
Tully, R. E. (1993). Three studies of Russell's neutral monism. Russell 13 (1):5-35. (Cited by 5 | Google)
Tully, Robert (1988). Russell's neutral monism. Russell 8:209-224. (Cited by 5 | Google)
Wood, Joanne A. (1994). Lighthouse bodies: The neutral monism of Virginia Woolf and Bertrand Russell. Journal of the History of Ideas 55 (3):483-502. (Google)

23 displayed