MindPapers: 3.1g. The Nature of Perceptual Experience, Misc

Aaron, R. I. (1958). The common sense view of sense-perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-14. (Google | Edit)

Ardley, Gavin (1959). The nature of perception. Philosophy Today 3:79-86. (Google | Edit)

Barnard, H. (1957). Quinton's variety of 'experience'. Mind 66 (January):88-90. (Google | More links | Edit)

Beck, Robert N. (1980). The world of perception. Philosophical Inquiry 2:458-465. (Google | Edit)

Blackburn, Simon (2005). Paradise regained. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (1):1-14. (Google | More links | Edit)

Blumenfeld, David C. (1959). On not seeing double. Philosophical Quarterly 9 (July):264-266. (Google | More links | Edit)

Britton, Karl (1952). Seeming, part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 195:195-214. (Google | Edit)

Charlesworth, Maurice (1979). Sense-impressions: A new model. Mind 88 (January):24-44. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links | Edit)

Chisholm, Roderick M. (1951). Reichenbach on observing and perceiving. Philosophical Studies 2 (April):45-48. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links | Edit)

Crane, Tim (online). The problem of perception. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Cited by 5 | Google | More links | Edit)

Abstract: Sense-perception—the awareness or apprehension of things by sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste—has long been a preoccupation of philosophers. One pervasive and traditional problem, sometimes called “the problem of perception”, is created by the phenomena of perceptual illusion and hallucination: if these kinds of error are possible, how can perception be what it intuitively seems to be, a direct and immediate access to reality? The present entry is about how these possibilities of error challenge the intelligibility of the phenomenon of perception, and how the major theories of perception in the last century are best understood as responses to this challenge

Crane, Tim (2005). What is the problem of perception? Synthesis Philosophica 2 (40):237-264. (Google | Edit)

Dawson, E. E. (1961). Sense experience and physical objects. Theoria 27:49-57. (Google | Edit)

Dewey, John (1927). An empirical account of appearance. Journal of Philosophy 24 (17):449-463. (Google | More links | Edit)

Djukic, George & Popescu, Vladimir B. (2003). A critique of Langsam's The Theory of Appearing Defended. Philosophical Studies 112 (1):69-91. (Google | More links | Edit)

Abstract: In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsams defenceof the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the faceof three standard arguments against it. These arguments are:the argument from hallucination; the argument from the samecause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptualtime-gap

Drake, Durant (1927). The data of consciousness as essences. Journal of Philosophy 24 (21):569-577. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links | Edit)

Fleming, Brice N. (1962). The nature of perception. Review of Metaphysics 16 (December):259-295. (Google | Edit)

Fogelin, Robert J. (1981). When I look at a tomato there is much I cannot see. The Monist 64 (January):109-123. (Google | Edit)

Galko, Jeffrey (2004). Ontology and perception. Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):1-18. (Google | Edit)

García-Carpintero, Manuel (1999). Searle on perception. Teorema 18 (1):19-41. (Cited by 2 | Google | More links | Edit)

Gibson, Quentin (1966). Is there a problem about appearances? Philosophical Quarterly 16 (October):319-328. (Google | More links | Edit)

Gledhill, A. R. (1970). An Analysis Of Sense Experience. Regency Press. (Google | Edit)

Hawkins, Denis J. B. (1945). The Criticism Of Experience. Sheed & Ward,. (Cited by 3 | Google | Edit)

Hellie, Benj (online). Phenomenal contact. (Cited by 1 | Google | Edit)

Hirst, R. J. (1966). Sentience and mr Myers. Mind 75 (January):122-124. (Google | More links | Edit)

Hirst, R. J. (1954). Sensing and observing, part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 197:197-218. (Google | Edit)

Hirst, R. J. (1959). The Problems Of Perception. Macmillan. (Cited by 23 | Google | More links | Edit)

Ingram-Pearson, C. W. (1955). The reality of appearances. Review of Metaphysics 9 (December):200-206. (Google | Edit)

Lachs, John (1965). Experience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 3:10-17. (Google | Edit)

Lamprecht, Sterling P. (1929). Sense qualities and material things. Philosophical Review 38 (1):23-41. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links | Edit)

Lamprecht, Sterling P. (1922). The metaphysical status of sensations. Journal of Philosophy 19 (7):169-181. (Google | More links | Edit)

Langsam, Harold (1997). The theory of appearing defended. Philosophical Studies 87 (1):33-59. (Cited by 13 | Google | More links | Edit)

Leighton, Joseph A. (1910). Perception and physical reality. Philosophical Review 19 (1):1-21. (Google | More links | Edit)

Malinovich, Stanley (1964). Perception: An experience or an achievement? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (December):161-168. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links | Edit)

Manzotti, Riccardo (2006). A process oriented view of conscious perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (6):7-41. (Cited by 1 | Google | Edit)

Abstract: I present a view of conscious perception that supposes a processual unity between the activity in the brain and the perceived event in the external world. I use the rainbow to provide a first example, and subsequently extend the same rationale to more complex examples such as perception of objects, faces and movements. I use a process-based approach as an explanation of ordinary perception and other variants, such as illusions, memory, dreams and mental imagery. This approach provides new insights into the problem of conscious representation and phenomenal consciousness. It is a form of anti- cranialism different from but related to other kinds of externalism

Martin, Michael G. F. (2003). Sensible appearances. In T. Balwin (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. (Cited by 1 | Google | More links | Edit)

Martin, Michael G. F. (1998). Setting things before the mind. In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press. (Cited by 18 | Google | Edit)

Mcdaniel, S. V. (1963). A note on the percept theory. Mind 72 (July):409-413. (Google | More links | Edit)

Mundle, Clement W. K. (1960). Common sense versus mr. Hirst's theory of perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60:61-77. (Google | Edit)

Myers, Charles M. (1962). Perceptual events, states, and processes. Philosophy of Science 29 (July):285-291. (Google | More links | Edit)

Myers, Gerald E. (1957). 2.0.CO;2-A');return true;"href='http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-2638(195704)17:5<97:PAT"A>2.0.CO;2-A'>Perception and the 'time-lag' argument. Analysis 17 (April):97-102. (Google | Edit)

Nelson Wieman, Henry (1924). Experience, mind, and the concept. Journal of Philosophy 21 (21):561-572. (Google | Edit)

Price, H. H. (1952). Seeming, part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 215:215-234. (Google | Edit)

Quinton, Anthony M. (1952). Seeming, part III. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 235:235-252. (Google | Edit)

Quinton, Anthony M. (1955). The problem of perception. Mind 64 (January):28-51. (Cited by 11 | Google | More links | Edit)

Reichenbach, Hans (1951). On observing and perceiving. Philosophical Studies 2 (December):92-93. (Cited by 3 | Google | More links | Edit)

Sedivy, Sonia (2004). Wittgenstein's diagnosis of empiricism's third dogma: Why perception is not an amalgam of sensation and conceptualization. Philosophical Investigations 27 (1):1-33. (Cited by 3 | Google | More links | Edit)

Sellars, Wilfrid S. (1982). Sensa or sensings: Reflections on the ontology of perception. Philosophical Studies 41 (January):83-114. (Cited by 5 | Google | More links | Edit)

Sosa, Ernest (1992). Ayer on perception and reality. In The Philosophy of A. J. Ayer. Peru: Open Court. (Google | Edit)

Taylor, R. & Duggan, Timothy J. (1958). On seeing double. Philosophical Quarterly 8 (April):171-174. (Cited by 2 | Google | More links | Edit)

Thalberg, Irving (1973). Ingredients of perception. Analysis 33 (April):145-155. (Google | Edit)

Thomas, L. E. (1957). Looking. Philosophical Quarterly 7 (April):109-115. (Google | More links | Edit)

Travis, Charles S. (2005). The face of perception. In Hilary Putnam (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cited by 2 | Google | More links | Edit)

Valberg, Jerome J. (1992). The Puzzle of Experience. Oxford University Press. (Cited by 14 | Google | More links | Edit)

Walsh, Dorothy (1968). Appearances. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (January):61-65. (Google | More links | Edit)

Wilkie, Sean (1995). Searle's theory of visual experience. Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178):70-78. (Google | More links | Edit)

Wolgast, Elizabeth H. (1958). Perceiving and impressions. Philosophical Review 67 (April):226-236. (Google | More links | Edit)

Wollheim, R. (1954). Sensing and observing, part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 219:219-240. (Google | Edit)

Yolton, John W. (1959). A metaphysic of experience. Review of Metaphysics 12 (June):612-623. (Google | Edit)

3.1c	Intentionalism [36]

3.1d	Belief Theories [20]

3.1f	Disjunctivism [52]

Search tips