Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
updated 2008-05-09
 Compiled by David Chalmers (Editor) & David Bourget (Assistant Editor), Australian National University. Submit an entry.
 
click here for help on how to search

Perception :: Sensory Modalities :: Vision

See also:
Blinder, David (1986). A new look at vision. Topoi 5 (September):137-148. (Cited by 4 | Google)
Burge, Tyler (1989). Marr's theory of vision. In Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Cited by 4 | Google)
Churchland, Paul M. (1995). Machine stereopsis: A feedforward network for fast stereo vision with movable fusion plane. In Android Epistemology. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Cited by 1 | Google)
Clark, Austen (1996). Three varieties of visual field. Philosophical Psychology 9:477-95. (Cited by 5 | Google | More links)
Dilworth, John B. (2002). Varieties of visual representation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):183-206. (Google)
Farrell, B. A. (1977). On the psychological explanation of visual perception. Synthese 35 (3). (Google | More links)
Glezer, Vadim D. (1989). Vision and mind. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, VIII. New York: Elsevier Science. (Cited by 14 | Google | More links)
Hamlyn, David W. (1957). The visual field and perception, part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107:107-124. (Google)
Hellie, Benj (manuscript). Visual form, attention, and binocularity. (Google)
Hill, Christopher S. (online). Visual awareness and visual qualia. (Google)
Hyman, John (1986). The cartesian theory of vision. Ratio 28 (December):149-167. (Google)
Hyslop, James H. (1888). On wundt's theory of psychic synthesis in vision. Mind 13 (52):499-526. (Google | More links)
Kapitan, Tomis (1998). Vision, vector, veracity. In Christian Strub (ed.), Blick Und Bild. Wilhelm Fink Verlag. (Google)
Lloyd, A. C. (1957). The visual field and perception, part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 125:125-144. (Google)
Matthen, Mohan (2007). Defining vision: What homology thinking contributes. Biology and Philosophy 22 (5). (Google | More links)
Montgomery, Richard (1989). Discrimination, reidentification and the indeterminacy of early vision. Noûs 23 (September):413-435. (Cited by 2 | Google | More links)
Natsoulas, Thomas (1998). Field of view. Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (4):415-436. (Google)
Natsoulas, Thomas (1989). The distinction between visual perceiving and visual perceptual experience. Journal of Mind and Behavior 10:37-61. (Cited by 6 | Google)
New, Christopher (1976). Look, no eyes. Analysis 36 (March):137-141. (Google)
Pastore, Nicholas (1971). Selective History Of Theories Of Visual Perception, 1650-1950. Oxford University Press. (Cited by 30 | Google)
Pickering, F. R. (1975). Is light the proper object of vision? Mind 84 (January):119-121. (Google | More links)
Ryder, Dan (online). Explaining the "inhereness" of qualia representationally: Why we seem to have a visual field. (Google)
Schwartz, Robert (1994). Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Cambridge: Blackwell. (Cited by 35 | Google)
Schwitzgebel, Eric (online). When our eyes are closed, what, if anything, do we visually experience? (Google | More links)
Smith, Barry C. (1999). Truth and the visual field. In Jean Petitot (ed.), Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Cited by 13 | Google | More links)
Wilson, Catherine (1993). Constancy, emergence, and illusions: Obstacles to a naturalistic theory of vision. In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Penn St University Press. (Google)
Wilson, Hugh R. (1991). Shadows on the cave wall: Philosophy and visual science. Philosophical Psychology 65:65-78. (Google)

27 displayed