MindPapers: 8.3k. Consciousness and Psychology, Foundational Issues

Adolphs, Ralph (2007). Consciousness: Situated and social. In Philip David Zelazo, Morris Moscovitch & Evan Thompson (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge. (Cited by 1 | Google | Edit)

Baars, Bernard J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press. (Cited by 953 | Google | More links | Edit)

Abstract: Figure 1.12 The continuum of clear and fuzzy events Figure 1.21 The Sperling Experiment: momentary conscious events may be difficult to recall Figure 1.24 The Pani Experiment: Predictable mental images habituate with practice Figure 1.37 Similarities between GW terms and other widespread ideas Figure 1.41 The Sokolov argument: Habituated stimuli are still represented in the nervous system Figure 1.44 The standard linguistic hierarchy Figure 2.13 Trade-offs to maintain consistency in the Ames distorted room Figure 2.14 Conscious experiences are always internally consistent Figure 2.2 Model 1: A global workspace in a distributed system Figure 2.42 Some time parameters of conscious experience and recall Figure 2.62 The "Mind's Senses" as a global workspace equivalent Figure 3.12 The ERTAS: a neural global workspace? Figure 3.13 One possible scenario: Cortical centers competing for access to ERTAS Figure 3.21 Model 1A: some changes suggested by the neurophysiology Figure 4.11 Priming effects: Conscious events increase access to similar events Figure 4.14 Presuppositions of the concept of "buying" that may become conscious upon violation Figure 4.23 A significance hierarchy of goal contexts Figure 4.3 Modeling contextual knowledge Figure 4.35 Model 2. Contexts compete and cooperate to influence conscious experience _{Figure 4.41} Surprising events erase conscious contents; the disruption may propagate through the

Baars, Bernard J. (1996). Understanding subjectivity: Global workspace theory and the resurrection of the observing self. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (3):211-17. (Cited by 20 | Google | More links | View target article(s) | Edit)

Abstract: The world of our experience consists at all times of two parts, an objective and a subjective part . . . The objective part is the sum total of whatsoever at any given time we may be thinking of, the subjective part is the inner 'state' in which the thinking comes to pass

Baars, Bernard J. (1986). What is a theory of consciousness a theory of? The search for criterial constraints on theory. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 1:3-24. (Cited by 4 | Google | Edit)

Benoit, P. J. & Benoit, W. L. (1986). Consciousness: The mindlessness/mindfulness and verbal report controversies. Western Journal of Speech Communication 50:41-63. (Google | Edit)

Bindra, D. (1970). The problem of subjective experience. Psychological Review 77:581-84. (Google | Edit)

Blanshard, Brand & Skinner, B. F. (1966). The problem of consciousness: A debate. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27:317-37. (Cited by 13 | Google | Edit)

Bush, Wendell T. (1905). An empirical definition of consciousness. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (21):561-568. (Google | More links | Edit)

Carlson, Richard A. (1992). Starting with consciousness. American Journal of Psychology 105:598-604. (Cited by 36 | Google | Edit)

Casler, L. (1976). The "consciousness problem" is not the problem. Perceptual and Motor Skills 42:227-32. (Cited by 2 | Google | Edit)

Cotterill, Rodney M. J. (2003). Consciousness, intelligence and creativity: A personal credo. In Neural Basis of Consciousness. Amsterdam: J Benjamins. (Google | Edit)

Dienes, Zoltán & Perner, Josef (2004). Assumptions of a subjective measure of consciousness: Three mappings. In Rocco J. Gennaro (ed.), Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness: An Anthology. John Benjamins. (Cited by 9 | Google | Edit)

Evans, Simon & Azzopardi, Paul (2007). Evaluation of a 'bias-free' measure of awareness. Spatial Vision. Special Issue 20 (1-2):61-77. (Google | More links | Edit)

Fechner, Gustav (online). The measurement of sensation. (Google | Edit)

Hebb, D. O. (1954). The problem of consciousness and introspection. In J. F. Delafresnaye (ed.), Brain Mechanisms and Consciousness. Blackwell. (Cited by 9 | Google | Edit)

Kihlstrom, John F. (1987). What this discipline needs is a good ten-cent taxonomy of consciousness. Canadian Psychology 28:116-118. (Google | Edit)

Merikle, Philip M. (1984). Toward a definition of awareness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22:449-50. (Cited by 16 | Google | Edit)

Natsoulas, Thomas (1981). Basic problems of consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41:132-78. (Cited by 13 | Google | Edit)

Natsoulas, Thomas (1990). Is consciousness what psychologists actually examine? American Journal of Psychology 105:363-84. (Cited by 9 | Google | Edit)

Natsoulas, Thomas (1974). The subjective, experiential element in perception. Psychological Bulletin 81:611-31. (Cited by 6 | Google | Edit)

Revonsuo, Antti (1993). Is there a ghost in the cognitive machinery? Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):387-405. (Cited by 1 | Google | Edit)

Rychlak, Joseph F. (1997). In Defense of Human Consciousness. American Psychological Association. (Cited by 19 | Google | More links | Edit)

Tolman, E. C. (1935). Psychology versus immediate experience. Philosophy of Science 2 (3):356-80. (Cited by 8 | Google | More links | Edit)

Velmans, Max (ed.) (2000). Investigating Phenomenal Consciousness: New Methodologies and Maps. John Benjamins. (Cited by 8 | Google | More links | Edit)

Wilber, Ken & Walsh, Roger (2000). An integral approach to consciousness research: A proposal for integrating first, second, and third person approaches to consciousness. In Max Velmans (ed.), Investigating Phenomenal Consciousness: New Methodologies and Maps. John Benjamins. (Google | Edit)

Wilson, D. L. (1978). Brain mechanisms, consciousness, and introspection. In A. A. Sugarman & R. E. Tarter (eds.), Expanding Dimensions of Consciousness. Springer. (Google | Edit)

Zener, K. (1952). Significance of the experience of the individual for the science of psychology. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:354-69. (Cited by 3 | Google | Edit)

Search tips